Re: BUG #17974: Walsenders memory usage suddenly spike to 80G+ causing OOM and server reboot - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Michael Guissine
Subject Re: BUG #17974: Walsenders memory usage suddenly spike to 80G+ causing OOM and server reboot
Date
Msg-id CACxDrA=e_YsY4vh4MvZHG-BqLXM2k1-cZb3oeTjm1HJdm7vpxw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #17974: Walsenders memory usage suddenly spike to 80G+ causing OOM and server reboot  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-bugs
I should stand corrected @Andres Freund , the memory DID recover immediately after reboot, but quickly start dropping again shortly after. It fully recovered only after we dropped and recreated all replication slots.

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 6:15 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
Hi,

On 2023-06-14 10:23:32 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:05:32AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> > We are running relatively large and busy Postgres database on RDS and using
> > logical replication extensively. We currently have 7 walsenders and while we
> > often see replication falls behind due to high transactional volume, we've
> > never experienced memory issues in 14.6 and below. After recent upgrade to
> > 14.8, we already had several incidents where walsender processes RES memory
> > would suddenly increase to over 80GB each causing freeable memory on the
> > instance to go down to zero.

When postgres knows it ran out of memory (instead of having gotten killed by
the OOM killer), it'll dump memory context information to the log. Could you
check whether there are related log entries?  They should precede an "out of
memory" ERROR.


> > Interesting that even after Instance reboot,
> > the memory used by walsender processes won't get released until we restart
> > the replication and drop the logical slots. The logical_decoding_work_mem
> > was set to 512MB in time of the last incident but we recently lowered it to
> > 128MB.

That seems very unlikely to be the case. If you restarted postgres or postgres
and the OS, there's nothing to have allocated the memory. What exactly do you
mean by "Instance reboot"?


> > Any known issues in pg 14.8 that would trigger this behaviour?
>
> Yes, there are known issues with memory handling in logical
> replication setups.  See for example this thread:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMnUB3oYugXCBLSkih+qNsWQPciEwos6g_AMbnz_peNoxfHwyw@mail.gmail.com

Why would 14.8 have made that problem worse?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #17983: Assert IsTransactionState() failed when empty string statement prepared in aborted transaction
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17978: Unexpected error: "wrong varnullingrels (b) (expected (b 5)) for Var 6/2" triggered by JOIN