Re: pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tomasz Szypowski
Subject Re: pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id CACmJi2JsWWLjQ+NfYPUaS7w3d15Ehrd2-PFmLgVA6LyrQn03Eg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Yes, generalny i use 11.4 bins, but libpq, dump, dumpall, restore and psql are old ones.
Nów I have made the test with original 9.5.16 to 10.2 and it succeeded. If it is the binary version problem, I´m a little bit surprised, because I havent´s seen it in a code.
If it is the only bug, that you have, so please do not change code, due to my problem :-). I ´ll do my test one more time, this time with 11.2 binaries. Will let you then know.

regards
Thomas

W dniu pon., 18.03.2019 o 23:54 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napisał(a):
Tomasz Szypowski <tomasz.szypowski@gmail.com> writes:
> As far as I remember pg_upgrade is from 11.2 rest is from 9.5.

If you're not certain, run each program with the --version switch
to find out.  But pg_upgrade should be refusing to use pg_dump
et al that aren't from its own major version.

                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Matthias Otterbach
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15700: PG 10 vs. 11: Large increase in memory usage whenselecting BYTEA data (maybe memory leak)
Next
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #15702: Bug in pgadmin 4.3 for tables with json columns