Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors
Date
Msg-id CACjxUsOQw=vYjPWZQ29GmgWU8ZKj336OGiNQX5Z2W-AcV12+Nw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:

> As far as I understand her proposal, it is exactly the opposite -- if a
> transaction fails, it is discarded.  And this P.S. note is asking
> whether this is a good idea, or would we prefer that failing
> transactions are retried.
>
> I think it's pretty obvious that transactions that failed with
> some serializability problem should be retried.

Agreed all around.

-- 
Kevin Grittner
VMware vCenter Server
https://www.vmware.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Decimal64 and Decimal128