Re: snapshot too old, configured by time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: snapshot too old, configured by time
Date
Msg-id CACjxUsMQctYnwJi62BzrBY-773fuGWRcOJKgfPthuKkVpAvHow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: snapshot too old, configured by time  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: snapshot too old, configured by time  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:

> [Does the patch allow dangling page pointers?]

> Again, I don't want to prejudice anyone against your patch, which I
> haven't read.

I don't believe that the way the patch does its business opens any
new vulnerabilities of this type.  If you see such after looking at
the patch, let me know.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Very small patch for decode.c
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: large regression for parallel COPY