Re: Regarding built-in logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Ranjan Gajare
Subject Re: Regarding built-in logical replication
Date
Msg-id CACj5rkZW_iB=JBBB1bP5gZRCpwGBPK6XrOHY3U5aj5nMF5Wb_g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Regarding built-in logical replication  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-docs
This means it would work with version 10 and its later versions. No backward compatibility is possible.
Thanks for resolution. 

Ranjan Gajare


On 12-Jan-2018 2:14 AM, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 1/11/18 09:48, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication.html
> Description:
>
> I am referring to link
> 'https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication.html' and it
> has been mentioned that 'Replicating between different major versions of
> PostgreSQL.' under the section of 'The typical use-cases for logical
> replication are:' but I don't think logical replication using
> PUBLICATION/SUBSCRIPTION model is possible between different PostgreSQL
> versions, which is only possible using pglogical.

The documentation is correct.

(The only caveat is that there are currently no other versions than 10
that have built-in logical replication, but if there were any, it would
work.)

--
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Regarding built-in logical replication
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] No reference to postgres_fdw in FTS docs