Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Implicit conversion from int64 to int32 when calling hash_get_num_entries - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Karina Litskevich
Subject Re: Implicit conversion from int64 to int32 when calling hash_get_num_entries
Date
Msg-id CACiT8iaih3UnYXyTahQ-4Lz4L2p4epGKAFAd+R8QKA+LkM3zcA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Implicit conversion from int64 to int32 when calling hash_get_num_entries  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Thank you for the review, Daniel.

On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:36 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
> Given the likelihood of an issue in backbranches, we could also only apply for
> v19 and leave the backbranches.
>

I'm okay with that too.

Best regards,
Karina Litskevich
Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com/

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Grab bag of smaller OpenSSL fixups
Next
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM FULL or CREATE INDEX fails with error: missing chunk number 0 for toast value XXX