On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> It seems pretty confusing that synchronous_commit = 'remote_write' means
> write confirmed to the remote socket, not write to the file system. Is
> there no better term we could some up with? remote_pipe?
> remote_transfer?
remote_accept?
And then, I could envision (if it continues down this road): off local remote_accept remote_write remote_sync
remote_apply(implies visible to new connections on the standby)
Not saying all off these are necessarily worth it, but they are all
the various "stages" of WAL processing on the remote...
--
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god,
aidan@highrise.ca command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
