Re: mosbench revisited - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aidan Van Dyk
Subject Re: mosbench revisited
Date
Msg-id CAC_2qU_4ftYZVg-e0s2Zvb5GOtyH-Vdg-aS+FsoSx5Tk2dD3Kg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: mosbench revisited  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: mosbench revisited
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

>      And hoping that the Linux guys decide to do something about it.
>  This isn't really our bug - lseek is quite cheap in the uncontended
> case.

Has anyone tried this on a recent kernel (i.e. 2.6.39 or later), where
they've finally remove the BKL out of VFS/inode?

I mean, complaining about scalability in linux 2.6.18 is like
complaining about scalability in postgresql 8.2 ;-)

a.

--
Aidan Van Dyk                                             Create like a god,
aidan@highrise.ca                                       command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/                                   work like a slave.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Reduce WAL logging of INSERT SELECT
Next
From: daveg
Date:
Subject: Re: error: could not find pg_class tuple for index 2662