Re: Schema version management - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aidan Van Dyk
Subject Re: Schema version management
Date
Msg-id CAC_2qU9DT1f-c=NUjrh0vtSOR-xnU9t7faqaQief08Zijqa3RQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Schema version management  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Schema version management  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Schema version management  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:

> I have code in the wild that defines new operators and casts and has no
> C code and is not in an extension and has no business being in an
> extension.

Nobody is claiming that pgdump shouldn't dump it.

But, since you're using operators, what would you think is an
appropriate name for the file the operator is dumped into?

a.


-- 
Aidan Van Dyk                                             Create like a god,
aidan@highrise.ca                                       command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/                                   work like a slave.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug tracker tool we need
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes