Re: Bugs status tracking - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From VASUKI M
Subject Re: Bugs status tracking
Date
Msg-id CACTYHzh4L47963dxWT0sWbAJuRbCH8CVxVO4taj+Cyvt_EoR3Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bugs status tracking  (Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs

Hi Greg,

Thank you for your response and feedback.

I have created a demo repository for tracking pgsql-bugs reports:
🔗 GitHub Repository

The goal of this repo is to provide a structured view of bug reports from the pgsql-bugs mailing list while ensuring that all discussions continue in the mailing list itself. Each GitHub issue contains details such as the subject, date, and message ID to help contributors quickly find and respond to the original thread.

I understand that this is just an initial proof of concept, and I welcome any feedback or suggestions on improving the workflow. I appreciate your advice, and I’ll iterate on this based on community input.

Looking forward to your thoughts!

Best,
Vasuki


On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 at 20:01, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 2:47 AM VASUKI M <vasukim1992002@gmail.com> wrote:
Please can u tell whether it is ok or not or do we need to change anything ,as of now the community is bigger and we have people to track the status so please give suggestions or corrections.

All of our data is public and free to use, so you are welcome to do with it what you want.

I would suggest just creating a proof of concept and let's see what it looks like. Nobody is going to officially bless it beforehand. Being able to see and critique an actual workflow is invaluable.

Be warned that no matter what you come up with, not everyone will be happy with it. That's the nature of things, so don't be discouraged.

Cheers,
Greg

--
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Richard Guo
Date:
Subject: Re: Query result differences between PostgreSQL 17 vs 16
Next
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #18822: mailing lists reject mails due to DKIM-signature