Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2 - Mailing list psycopg

From Marko Kreen
Subject Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2
Date
Msg-id CACMqXCK_gmeGmvEbpg3FpsHOCET47eXoxvizBKprG2dGGTYC0g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2  (Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>)
List psycopg
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Daniele Varrazzo
<daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marko, I've noted just now the "snafu" in the title: do you have
> anything to complain about? Please make an explicit list of your
> points because - but it may be just me not understanding the
> subtleties of the English language - I feel your tone in this thread a
> little bit on the unpleasant side.

Well, I'm bit frustrated but I can't complain much - thats the reason
for "snafu" -
two relatively innocent problems on their own (SN) created mess when
put together (AFU).

If you really want me to complain then I would complain about non-bugfix changes
in pscyopg micro releases.  Looking at the changes, the 2.4.[23]
should have bumped
the minor version at least.  Basically, no psycopg micro version can
be considered
as "safe upgrade".

OTOH, if the isolation-level shuffle would have been in 2.5, instead 2.4.2,
it would not helped much, because that part of code did not have
dedicated tests,
and was considered stable for years.  So the mess would have happened anyway.
So I cannot complain too much.

--
marko

psycopg by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2
Next
From: Federico Di Gregorio
Date:
Subject: Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2