Re: Anyone have experience using PG on a NetApp All-Flash FAS8000? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Varadharajan Mukundan
Subject Re: Anyone have experience using PG on a NetApp All-Flash FAS8000?
Date
Msg-id CACKkDGH=D4DA-RH9=Rpghg_X_8y2ry7uyOYdDtk9yezf4Bm6uQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Anyone have experience using PG on a NetApp All-Flash FAS8000?  (Mel Llaguno <mllaguno@coverity.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi Mel,

I don't have any experience in NetApp storage systems, but if
compression / deduplication is the only point for which you're
consider NetApp, then do consider FS like ZFS or btrfs which can do
deduplication as well as compression on normal disks.  Here are few
reports of running Postgres on ZFS
(http://www.citusdata.com/blog/64-zfs-compression)  and btrfs
(http://no0p.github.io/postgresql/2014/09/06/benchmarking-postgresql-btrfs-zlib.html)

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Mel Llaguno <mllaguno@coverity.com> wrote:
> The reason I ask is that it seems to support deduplication/compression. I
> was wondering if this would have any performance implications of PG
> operations.
>
>
> Thanks, M.
>
>
> Mel Llaguno • Staff Engineer – Team Lead
> Office: +1.403.264.9717 x310
> www.coverity.com <http://www.coverity.com/> • Twitter: @coverity
> Coverity by Synopsys



--
Thanks,
M. Varadharajan

------------------------------------------------

"Experience is what you get when you didn't get what you wanted"
               -By Prof. Randy Pausch in "The Last Lecture"

My Journal :- www.thinkasgeek.wordpress.com


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance issues
Next
From: Gavin Flower
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance issues