On Sat, Oct 25, 2025 at 1:48 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 08:28:45PM -0500, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > On Sunday, September 28, 2025, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Since we already support INCLUDING STORAGE, I’m not sure that
> >> INCLUDING STORAGE PARAMETER is the right syntax to go with.
> >
> > I’d just call it “including parameters”; sure, all of the existing ones are
> > storage related, but if there were non-storage ones we’d include those as
> > well, so qualifying with a parameter type doesn’t seem correct.
>
> +1
>
> --
> nathan
hi.
attached patch using syntax:
CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING PARAMETERS.