On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 6:41 AM Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com> wrote:
>
> Generally looks good to me, I only found a few typos:
>
> + errmsg("saving error information to table \"%s\" row
dueto
> data type incompatibility at line %" PRIu64 " for column \"%s\":
> \"%s\"",
>
> Is row needed there?
>
> + * TODO: Allow cstate->error_rel to be a partitioned table. This should be
> + * not difficult, but requires proper handling of constraints and triggers
>
> should not be difficult
>
> + privileges on it. During the error records inseration,
> + <literal>NOT NULL</literal> and <literal>CHECK</literal>
> constraints are enforced,
> + and both row-level and statement-level triggers will be fired.
>
> record's insertion
>
I fixed these two issues.
I rebased the patch and made some tweaks; nothing significant.
> Maybe this could explicitly mention that failure to insert into the
> error table will fail the copy statement? Or some better wording of
> that, as it is allowed behavior with triggers.
>
I plan to document this more later, since the overall design may not
be completely bulletproof yet.
--
jian
https://www.enterprisedb.com/