Re: [BUG] FailedAssertion in SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Maxim Orlov
Subject Re: [BUG] FailedAssertion in SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn
Date
Msg-id CACG=ezZ+OW7EXODojXoP191BNQK6h_WHWF1jh3wEvO0OiMHfZQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUG] FailedAssertion in SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [BUG] FailedAssertion in SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn
List pgsql-hackers


On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 09:40, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 4:43 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:48 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:00 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Agreed not to have a test case for this.
> >
> > I've attached an updated patch. I've confirmed this patch works for
> > all supported branches.
> >
>
> I have slightly changed the checks used in the patch, otherwise looks
> good to me. I am planning to push (v11-v15) the attached tomorrow
> unless there are more comments.
>

Pushed.
A big thanks to you! Could you also, close the commitfest entry https://commitfest.postgresql.org/41/4024/, please?

--
Best regards,
Maxim Orlov.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: Avoid distributing new catalog snapshot again for the transaction being decoded.
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: batch inserts vs. before row triggers