Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3? - Mailing list psycopg

From Oleksandr Shulgin
Subject Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
Date
Msg-id CACACo5T+PBVTTgAASbEqK6cZQDwKDNSiPvfvCHsKHU3d1_Berg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?  (Vladimir Ryabtsev <greatvovan@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?  (Matthieu Rigal <matt.rigal@googlemail.com>)
List psycopg
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:27 PM Vladimir Ryabtsev <greatvovan@gmail.com> wrote:
As long as psycopg2 is not disappearing anywhere, psycopg3 seems better.
New users will interpret psycopg2 as "more advanced psycopg".

I second that opinion.  Also, a suggestion to skip "3" and go with "4" doesn't seem to help against the Python version confusion concern, assuming there is Python4 in some (distant?) future.

My 3¢,
--
Alex

psycopg by date:

Previous
From: Daniele Varrazzo
Date:
Subject: Re: Using composite types in psycopg3
Next
From: Matthieu Rigal
Date:
Subject: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?