We have another thread for this. We have patches also. Last year, we
planned to block these databases at creation time.
>
> It's probably harmless, we connect to the databases further down to do actual work. But it's also not nice. The toc.glo seems to have a bunch of extraneous entries of type COMMENT and CONNECT. Why is that? As far as poible this should have output pretty much identical to a plain pg_dumpall.
>
>
> cheers
>
>
> andrew
If we don't dump those comments in non-text format, then the output of
"pg_restore -f filename dump_non_text" will not be the same as the
plain dump of pg_dumpall.
Here, I am attaching an updated patch for the review and testing.
Hi Mahendra,
I found a scenario in which the table is not restored if --transaction-size switch is used at the time of pg_restore operation
Please refer this scenario:
Case A --pg_restore operation with "--transaction-size" against the dump (taken using pg_dump) -
create a table ( create table t(n int); )
perform pg_dump ( ./pg_dump -Ft postgres -f xyz.tar)
create a database (create database test;)
perform pg_restore using switch "--transaction-size" ( ./pg_restore --transaction-size=1 -d test xyz.tar)
table is restored into test database
Case B --pg_restore operation with "--transaction-size" against the dump (taken using pg_dumpall) -
create a table ( create table t(n int); )
perform pg_dumpall ( ./pg_dumpall -Ft -f abc.tar)
create a new cluster, start the server against a different port
perform pg_restore using switch "--transaction-size" (./pg_restore -Ft --transaction-size=10 -d postgres abc.tar -p 9000 -C)
table is not restored
if i remove --transaction-size switch then this works.
regards,
