Re: SELECT count(*) differs from result in pgadmin - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tobias Larsen
Subject Re: SELECT count(*) differs from result in pgadmin
Date
Msg-id CAC+idWw45ksoFYGdZ1xoFe2SVJx_zFHi0Ar-KwVG=zC79e9WBQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to SELECT count(*) differs from result in pgadmin  (Tobias Larsen <tobiasl@reto.dk>)
Responses Re: SELECT count(*) differs from result in pgadmin
List pgsql-general
Oops, got it. Count(*) includes the rowcount of tables that inherit from the table queried? I wasn't counting on that.


On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Tobias Larsen <tobiasl@reto.dk> wrote:
This is a small, but weird problem. Completely regular table :
- requesting count in pgadmin shows 3124448 rows
- running SELECT count(*) via the query tool returns 5997620

Why is there a difference? There's nothing remotely remarkable about the table.

I've run a full database VACUUM just to be certain
I've run VACUUM ANALYZE on that specific table
Database version is 9.1 (x64) on windows


verbose output from vacuum is 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INFO:  vacuuming "public.<tablename>"
INFO:  index "<tablename>_pkey" now contains 3124448 row versions in 12233 pages
DETAIL:  0 index row versions were removed.
0 index pages have been deleted, 0 are currently reusable.
CPU 0.09s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.09 sec.
INFO:  index "<tablename>_character_id" now contains 3124448 row versions in 14898 pages
DETAIL:  0 index row versions were removed.
0 index pages have been deleted, 0 are currently reusable.
CPU 0.10s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.10 sec.
INFO:  index "<tablename>_index" now contains 3124448 row versions in 14694 pages
DETAIL:  0 index row versions were removed.
0 index pages have been deleted, 0 are currently reusable.
CPU 0.07s/0.03u sec elapsed 0.10 sec.
INFO:  index "<tablename>_key_idx" now contains 3124448 row versions in 23154 pages
DETAIL:  0 index row versions were removed.
0 index pages have been deleted, 0 are currently reusable.
CPU 0.12s/0.04u sec elapsed 0.16 sec.
INFO:  "<tablename>": found 0 removable, 0 nonremovable row versions in 0 out of 104149 pages
DETAIL:  0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
There were 0 unused item pointers.
0 pages are entirely empty.
CPU 0.40s/0.07u sec elapsed 0.50 sec.
INFO:  analyzing "public.<tablename>"
INFO:  "<tablename>": scanned 30000 of 104149 pages, containing 900000 live rows and 0 dead rows; 30000 rows in sample, 3124454 estimated total rows
INFO:  analyzing "public.<tablename>" inheritance tree
INFO:  "<tablename>": scanned 15628 of 104149 pages, containing 468840 live rows and 0 dead rows; 15628 rows in sample, 3124451 estimated total rows
INFO:  "archive_<tablename>": scanned 14372 of 95773 pages, containing 431160 live rows and 0 dead rows; 14372 rows in sample, 2873175 estimated total rows
Query returned successfully with no result in 2611 ms.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

...So it would seem that PGAdmin is correct, but why am I getting the wrong number from SELECT Count(*)?

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Does it make sense to break a large query into separate functions?
Next
From: Raghavendra
Date:
Subject: Re: PAM implementation in PG 9.2.3