Re: TAP tests and symlinks on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Juan José Santamaría Flecha
Subject Re: TAP tests and symlinks on Windows
Date
Msg-id CAC+AXB0VJ9A4f6Ob9b3wV8V_VGND5X3MBLKQRd0+8L6t-gMiCQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TAP tests and symlinks on Windows  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: TAP tests and symlinks on Windows
List pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 9:00 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 11:26:19AM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Plus a note in the Win32 docs that Win32::Symlink may be required to run
> some tests on some Perl/Windows versions..

Planting such a check in individual scripts is not a good idea because
it would get forgotten.  The best way to handle that is to add a new
check in the BEGIN block of TestLib.pm.  Note that we already do that
with createFile, OsFHandleOpen and CloseHandle.  Now the question is:
do we really want to make this a hard requirement?  I would like to
answer yes so as we make sure that this gets always tested, and this
needs proper documentation as you say.  Now it would be also possible
to check if the API is present in the BEGIN block of TestLib.pm, and
then use an independent variable similar to what we do with
$use_unix_sockets to decide if tests should be skipped or not, but you
cannot know if this gets actually, or ever, tested.

The first thing that comes to mind is adding an option to vcregress to choose whether symlinks will be tested or skipped, would that be an acceptable solution?

Regards,

Juan José Santamaría Flecha
 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Siarhei D
Date:
Subject: compile cube extension with float4 precision storing
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: doc review for v13