Re: Inconsistent results with libc sorting on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Juan José Santamaría Flecha
Subject Re: Inconsistent results with libc sorting on Windows
Date
Msg-id CAC+AXB0GCAHhT1FfaVzSnw0DjOJcbSPrO9BX4CKPMF1BqHFjoA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inconsistent results with libc sorting on Windows  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers


El lun, 3 jul 2023, 17:42, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> escribió:
On 2023-Jun-19, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:

> Ok, let's see where the report goes:
>
> https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/CompareStringEx-non-transitive/10393003?q=comparestringex

Hm, so this appears to have been marked as solved by Microsoft.  Can you
recheck?  Also, what does the resolution mean for Postgres, in practical
terms?


It's not really solved, they have just pushed the issue to another team that's only reachable through the Windows feedback hub. I've already provided the feedback, but it's only visible through the proprietary app.

I would say there haven't been any real progress on that front so far.

Regards,

Juan José Santamaría Flecha

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add <> support to sepgsql_restorecon