Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sameer Thakur
Subject Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation
Date
Msg-id CABzZFEvC0LWjDBdTi3WwB+JtAzZmBBP6FbjcaT8XV+QhinmUsg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers




>I've cleaned this up - revision attached - and marked it "ready for committer".
Thank you for this.
  I did the basic hygiene test. The patch applies correctly and compiles with no warnings. Did not find anything broken in basic functionality.
  In the documentation i have a minor suggestion of replacing phrase "might judge to be a non-distinct " with ->" may judge to be non-  distinct".

regards
Sameer 



View this message in context: Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: ruleutils vs. empty targetlists
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Extension Templates S03E11