On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 8:01 AM Karina Litskevich
<litskevichkarina@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> EB_SMGR and EB_REL are macros for making new structs.
>> IMO these are buggy, once make new structs without initializing all fields.
>> Attached a patch to fix this and make more clear when rel or smgr is NULL.
>
>
> As long as a structure is initialized, its fields that are not present in
> initialization are initialized to zeros and NULLs depending on their types.
> See C99 Standard 6.7.8.21 and 6.7.8.10. This behaviour is quite well known,
> so I don't think this place is buggy. Anyway, if someone else says the code
> is more readable with these fields initialized explicitly, then go on.
Even though I am not a fan of the Designated Initializers feature, I
agree with Karina. Per the standard, the unmentioned fields get
initialized to zeroes/NULLs, so the explicit initialization to
zero/null that this additional patch does is unnecessary. Moreover, I
feel that it makes the code less pleasant to read.
C99, 6.7.8.21:
> If there are fewer initializers in a brace-enclosed list than there are
> elements or members of an aggregate, or fewer characters in a string literal
> used to initialize an array of known size than there are elements in the array,
> the remainder of the aggregate shall be initialized implicitly the same as
> objects that have static storage duration.
C99, 6.7.8.10:
> If an object that has automatic storage duration is not initialized explicitly,
> its value is indeterminate. If an object that has static storage duration is
> not initialized explicitly, then:
> - if it has pointer type, it is initialized to a null pointer;
> - if it has arithmetic type, it is initialized to (positive or unsigned) zero;
> - if it is an aggregate, every member is initialized (recursively) according to these rules;
> - if it is a union, the first named member is initialized (recursively) according to these rules.
Best regards,
Gurjeet
http://Gurje.et
