Re: Shave a few instructions from child-process startup sequence - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gurjeet Singh
Subject Re: Shave a few instructions from child-process startup sequence
Date
Msg-id CABwTF4WE1YsppAJ1Vi7TgQ6m9=DjUZnsQAQFUByF3kK9U+S4Tg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shave a few instructions from child-process startup sequence  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Shave a few instructions from child-process startup sequence  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
But we're not buying much.  A few instructions during postmaster shutdown
is entirely negligible.

The patch is for ClosePostmasterPorts(), which is called from every child process startup sequence (as $subject also implies), not in postmaster shutdown. I hope that adds some weight to the argument.

Best regards,
--
Gurjeet Singh       gurjeet.singh.im
EnterpriseDB Inc. www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments