Re: Broken PG10 packages for F28 - Mailing list pgsql-pkg-yum

From Martín Marqués
Subject Re: Broken PG10 packages for F28
Date
Msg-id CABeG9Lt41STUM4HAk8ZcNcoss+6cpxQ1=9wTqcmR42PMT-s2NQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Broken PG10 packages for F28  (Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>)
List pgsql-pkg-yum
Thanks Devrim,

I can confirm this as fixed. Just updated PG10 here.

Regards,


El sáb., 23 feb. 2019 a las 22:10, Devrim Gündüz (<devrim@gunduz.org>) escribió:

Hi Martin,

On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 12:38 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
> Just trying to update my system I find that there's some broken (actually
> missing package) which doesn't let me upgrade all the PG10 packages:
>
>  Problema 1: package postgresql10-plpython3-10.6-1PGDG.f28.x86_64 requires
> postgresql10(x86-64) = 10.6-1PGDG.f28, but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - cannot install both postgresql10-10.7-1PGDG.f28.x86_64 and
> postgresql10-10.6-1PGDG.f28.x86_64
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> postgresql10-plpython3-10.6-1PGDG.f28.x86_64
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> postgresql10-10.6-1PGDG.f28.x86_64
>  Problema 2: problem with installed package
> postgresql10-plpython3-10.6-1PGDG.f28.x86_64
>   - package postgresql10-plpython3-10.6-1PGDG.f28.x86_64 requires
> postgresql10-server(x86-64) = 10.6-1PGDG.f28, but none of the providers can
> be installed
>   - cannot install both postgresql10-server-10.7-1PGDG.f28.x86_64 and
> postgresql10-server-10.6-1PGDG.f28.x86_64
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> postgresql10-server-10.6-1PGDG.f28.x86_64
>
> Seems postgresql10-plpython3-10.7 didn't roll out.

Just fixed this, and pushed 11.2-2 and 10.7-2 to repos.

Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR


--
Martín Marqués
It’s not that I have something to hide,
it’s that I have nothing I want you to see

pgsql-pkg-yum by date:

Previous
From: Devrim Gündüz
Date:
Subject: Re: Where are the 10.5-1PGDG.rhel7 rpms?
Next
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/Java 1.5.2 - fixes one regression in date conversion in 1.5.1