Re: Crashes on a partition whose concurrent detach never finished - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nisha Moond
Subject Re: Crashes on a partition whose concurrent detach never finished
Date
Msg-id CABdArM7LhFa8SyoSSOcgvSZJeG82JLHk4KY_r+CAJQTBPz0S7g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Crashes on a partition whose concurrent detach never finished  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 5:37 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ~~~
> >
> > Given that we are treating a detach-pending partition as an individual
> > table for publication decisions, the changes in patch-003 (pg19
> > regression) look correct to me. The changes in relcache.c correctly
> > treat the detach-pending partition as an individual table.
> >
>
> I haven't had a chance to reveiw 003 yet as 001 itself was
> problematic. Will review it tomorrow.
>

Here is a rebased version of 003 that applies independently on both
HEAD and pg19. This should make reviewing patch-003 separately easier.

--
Thanks,
Nisha

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Review items for EXCEPT TABLE publication
Next
From: "Greg Burd"
Date:
Subject: Re: Trying out