Re: Constraint documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lætitia Avrot
Subject Re: Constraint documentation
Date
Msg-id CAB_COdjmb812b23MRDaadWkRN5iBGK1eMP89yD5haDgK_0Usnw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Constraint documentation  (Brad DeJong <bpd0018@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Constraint documentation
Re: Constraint documentation
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

Thanks a lot. I did the modification. It's in the patch enclosed.

Have a nice day,

Lætitia

Le mar. 26 juin 2018 à 01:42, Brad DeJong <bpd0018@gmail.com> a écrit :
On 25/06/18 17:45, Lætitia Avrot wrote:
> +   <note>
> +    <para>
> +     Check constraint are not designed to enforce business rules across tables.
> +     Avoid using check constraints with function accessing other tables and

Subject/verb agreement - either "A check constraint is ..." or "Check constraints are ..." would be appropriate.


--
Think! Do you really need to print this email ?
There is no Planet B.
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: partition tree inspection functions
Next
From: Jeevan Ladhe
Date:
Subject: Re: partition tree inspection functions