Re: Adding a pg_servername() function - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laetitia Avrot
Subject Re: Adding a pg_servername() function
Date
Msg-id CAB_COdhqnX+rNTxcL1B1Ni0V4Xp6aErhX4BdEc28i8rJgfAwKQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding a pg_servername() function  (Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net>)
Responses Re: Adding a pg_servername() function
List pgsql-hackers
Dear all,

First, thank you so much for your interest in this patch. I didn't think I would have so many answers.

I agree that the feature I'm suggesting could be done with a few tricks. I meant to simplify the life of the user by providing a simple new feature. (Also, I might have trust issues with DNS due to several past production disasters.)

My question is very simple: Do you oppose having this feature in Postgres?

In other words, should I stop working on this?

Have a nice day,

Lætitia


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Incorrect handling of OOM in WAL replay leading to data loss