Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
Date
Msg-id CABUevEzrbWQMsyeMwGS7nGdqJdbdK=Z2QcBffZ=OCowU52nn9g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:14 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-04-26 13:43:31 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I think it's straightforward, if we decouple the tri-valued enum used
> > for guc.c purposes from a separate boolean that actually enables the
> > feature.  GUC sets the boolean to "off" initially when it sees the enum
> > as "auto", and then pg_stat_statement's _PG_init modifies it during its
> > own startup as needed.

That's pretty much exactly my original suggestion, yes :)


> > So the user can turn the GUC off, and then pg_stat_statement does
> > nothing and there is no performance drawback; or leave it "auto" and
> > it'll only compute query_id if pg_stat_statement is loaded; or leave it
> > on if they want the query_id for other purposes.
>
> I think that's the right direction. I wonder though if we shouldn't go a
> bit further. Have one guc that determines the "query id provider" (NULL
> or a shared library), and one GUC that configures whether query-id is
> computed (never, on-demand/auto, always). For the provider GUC load the
> .so and look up a function with some well known name.

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:37 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I have a preference to determining the provider via GUC instead of a
> hook because it is both easier to introspect and easier to configure.

+1 in general. Though we could of course also have a read-only
internal GUC that would show what we ended up with, and still
configure it with shared_preload_libraries, or loaded in some other
way. In a way it'd be cleaner to "always load modules with
shared_preload_libraries", but I can certainly see the arguments in
either direction..

But whichever way it's configured, having a well exposed way to know
what it actually is would be important.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Use simplehash.h instead of dynahash in SMgr