Hi, Am Montag, den 27.02.2017, 16:20 +0100 schrieb Magnus Hagander: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Is there an argument for back-patching this? > > > Seems you were typing that at the same time as we did. > > > I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take > your comment as a vote that we should back-patch it?
I've checked back into this thread, and there seems to be a +1 from Tom and a +(0.5-1) from Simon for backpatching, and no obvious -1s. Did you decide against it in the end, or is this still an open item?
No, I plan to work on it, so it's still an open item. I've been backlogged with other things, but I will try to get too it soon.
(This also includes considering Jeff's note)
I've applied a backpatch to 9.4. Prior to that pretty much the entire patch is a conflict, so it would need a full rewrite.
