Re: TODO links broken? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: TODO links broken?
Date
Msg-id CABUevEzfofMtWxraYoPpyy2sc4ArvDhN58xzX=Z9t9++QUxGCQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TODO links broken?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: TODO links broken?
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Stephen Scheck
> <singularsyntax@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Many of the links in the TODO wiki page result in a "page not found" error.
>> Is this page up-to-date?
>> Can anything be inferred about the status of these items from the broken
>> link?
>
> I think what we can infer is that the new archives code is broken.  I
> hope someone is planning to fix that.  If there's been some decision

Yes. We can infer that. It makes it a whole lot easier to fix
something with better bug repors than that, of course, as I'm sure you
(Robert in this case, not Stephen) are generally aware of.

I've reverted a patch that was applied a few days ago that dealt with
how URLs are parsed, and I think that's the one that's responsible.
But it would be good to have an actual example of what didn't work,
because the links i tried all worked...

> made that we don't have to support the historical URLs for our
> archives pages, I think that's a really bad plan; those links are in a
> lot more places than just the Todo.

No, the plan has always been to support those. There are no plans to
remove that.

-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO links broken?
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Inconsistent DB data in Streaming Replication