Re: docbook-xsl version for release builds - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: docbook-xsl version for release builds
Date
Msg-id CABUevEzbE8Z8Bap1igS6v52OAfeOXKbMSPqpvgFeANVUdP4CqQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: docbook-xsl version for release builds  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: docbook-xsl version for release builds
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> >> On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:30 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> >>> Given that, I'm fine with just bumping the version on borka to that
>> >>> version. Any objections?
>> >
>> >> This was not done for 9.3rc1, AFAICT.  Let's please do it for the next
>> >> release builds.
>> >
>> > Um ... touching borka's toolchain post-rc1 sure sounds like a recipe
>> > for making ourselves look like idiots in a high-profile release.
>> > Wouldn't it be better to wait till after 9.3.0?
>>
>> I agree that doing it after the RC is a bad idea. We should probably
>> try to do it more or less directly after the release though, so we
>> (I..) don't forget it again...
>
> Did we get around to doing this?

Nope.

Given my schedule between now and the release wrap, I won't have a
chance to do it if I want any reasonable ability to roll it back if it
fails. But if you want to ahead and get it done, go ahead :)

-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Samrat Revagade
Date:
Subject: Re: setting separate values of replication parameters to each standby to provide more granularity
Next
From: Jeevan Chalke
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revive line type