Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg
Date
Msg-id CABUevEzRFtEfJ20JSJfL3VxMdby+vM5GcMWCvV=7qo=FRQiK7A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg
List pgsql-general
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:31 PM, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:
On 5/3/2017 2:20 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

Please note that this method of building libpq has been removed from Postgres 10, so it's considered to be deprecated for quite some time.


this page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/install-windows-libpq.html probably should be updated then.


That page is completely gone in version 10. If you look at https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/install-windows.html you will notice the entire 17.2 section has been removed, as well as the text on the root page referring to it.

--

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alban Hertroys
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Column information
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Compatibility of libpg