Re: pg_regress application_name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: pg_regress application_name
Date
Msg-id CABUevEzM+1r8BiLR6hSQV=QMjgRs+BMD+6z997ZbExgBBvhwYw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_regress application_name  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:47, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> I figured it would be good if pg_regress reported its application_name
> as "pg_regress" rather than "psql".  Any objections to the attached
> patch?

Sounds like a good idea to me, +1.


--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: pg_regress application_name
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2