Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes: > As a short term fix we should either a) remove these links completely or b) > link to archived copies of the pages on archive.org; or c) find a more > appropriate pages to link to. A quick search didn't turn up anything I would > prefer for (c), and I'm not sure what he legality of linking to a cached copy > is, so I would advocate for (a).
+1. It should have been obvious just from the spelling of this URL that it wasn't intended to be a long term stable location. Digging in the git history shows we've already updated it twice, and I wonder how many changes there were that we didn't notice.
Just reverting bbd3bdba3 seems appropriate to me.
+1.
If we want to keep a set of such links, probably the wiki is a better place as more people can easily fix them there.
