On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> Heh - we already used ERRCODE_CONNECTION_FAILURE on the errors in
>> copy.c. Since COPY can only happen when there is a transaction
>> (right?), I just changed those error messages for consistency.
>
> Agreed on changing the message texts to match, but I wonder whether
> we ought not switch all those SQLSTATEs to something different. Per my
> comment to Kevin, I think the whole 08 class is meant to be issued on
> the client side. Maybe it's okay to conflate a server-detected
> connection loss with client-detected loss, but I'm not convinced.
Sure,that's a simple search and replace of course... If we can come to
a decision about what codes to actually use. I'm not sure I have much
input other than that I agree they need to be different :-)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
