Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > Over in the issue-tracker thread, > > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > Evidently, the "flat" link is easy to miss. Give it a try. > > > > I submit that the reason people miss what that's for is that it's very > > unintuitively named. What about using "whole thread" instead of "flat"? > > > > ("flat" is fine as a component of the resulting URL. Just not as the > > button label.) > > That's easy enough to change. Another option might be "linear"? But I'm > guessing what you're trying to convey is especially the whole thread part, > rather than the "orientation"?
I think "whole thread" is easier to catch for newcomers, so +1 for that (but keep "flat" as the URL itself.)
I've deployed this change on the system. It will trickle out to the different threads as they expire from the cache.
