Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches
Date
Msg-id CABUevEyozmZoRywW9-0i0tX6sqWwVQ4gk81zvFXx_6VmMOMqyQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,

I guess that commit fest 2016-03 is going to begin soon, at which
point nobody will be able to add new patches because
1) already closed CF don't accept them.
2) A CF currently running neither.
I propose to create an extra CF, called "Future" or similar where
people will be able to park the patches submitted for the 9.7 cycle.
This will be renamed later on as the first CF of 9.7 once the
development schedule for 9.7 is decided.

Thoughts?

Yeah, we can do that. I'd suggest we either name it based on the current tentative date for CF1 (september), or name it specificaly "9.7-first" or something like that rather than just plain "future", to make it more clear.

--

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Commitfest Bug (was: Re: Reusing abbreviated keys during second pass of ordered [set] aggregates)
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'