On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:
Re: Magnus Hagander 2016-10-23 <CABUevEwhNKNu3Oes02NMwF7tFA=--_KTBSts7uiL9M7YSV4GvA@mail.gmail.com> > To be over-clear, that leaves xenial, trusty and precise on the Ubuntu > download page.
Ack. > > Do we see a real user demand for the non-LTS releases so it would make > > sense to add them? (In the past, that wasn't always the case.) > > Normally those versions already carry the latest version of postgres at > their release time, right? So it's not like they are without postgres, or > are stuck with a really old version?
The latest PG version released before freeze time, which is more likely the second-latest version for the NN.10 releases, given PG releases around September, and .10 is frozen some time before it:
Right. But they still receive a PostgreSQL version that's new enough that it will have a longer "support life" than the OS version itself.
