<p dir="ltr"><br /> On May 12, 2015 4:13 PM, "Stephen Frost" <<a
href="mailto:sfrost@snowman.net">sfrost@snowman.net</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> > * Magnus Hagander (<a
href="mailto:magnus@hagander.net">magnus@hagander.net</a>)wrote:<br /> > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:21 PM,
StephenFrost <<a href="mailto:sfrost@snowman.net">sfrost@snowman.net</a>> wrote:<br /> > > > * Magnus
Hagander(<a href="mailto:magnus@hagander.net">magnus@hagander.net</a>) wrote:<br /> > > > > We could also
usethe category that we have now, or even create the<br /> > > > concept<br /> > > > > of a tag
(whereyou can assign multiple ones). And then have a view that<br /> > > > > brings together a view of
everythingwith a specific tag/category,<br /> > > > > *regardless* of which CF it's on.<br /> > >
><br/> > > > I like the tag idea.<br /> > ><br /> > > Are there other things you would consider
tagsfor as well? As in should we<br /> > > if we do this look at a generic tag system, or just a "tag this is
a<br/> > > bugfix"?<br /> ><br /> > I was thinking a generic system though I'm not sure that the tags
should<br/> > be free-form.. My first thought is a "release" tag, ie: 9.4.2 or<br /> > something. Having a
'committed'+ '9.4.2' view would be kind of neat.<p dir="ltr">I am definitely not sold on the idea of per release tag.
Ithink that unnecessarily duplicates information that is already in git and belongs there. For that, I'd rather add a
fieldwith the commit id something ended up with (more than one per entry possible of course). But I'd like to hear from
othersas well. <br /><br /><br /><p dir="ltr">> > > The biggest issue that I see with this is, again, trying
tomake sure<br /> > > > people know that they *should* put bug patches into the CF and make it<br /> > >
>clear *which* CF to put them into.<br /> > > ><br /> > > > I don't know that we've even got an
answerfor the second question<br /> > > > currently, do we? My thought is "whatever one people are looking
at<br/> > > > now" but I'm guessing others feel differently.<br /> > ><br /> > > I would say it
shouldgo into whatever CF is currently "Open". Don't treat<br /> > > thems eparately from a submission POV, other
thanadding the tag. Only from<br /> > > a "consumption" POV, through the special view.<br /> ><br /> >
Yeah,but "Open" currently means June. Perhaps that's not an issue but<br /> > it still feels awkward to me.<p
dir="ltr">Toview bugs you would not care about that though and just look at the consolidated report. <p
dir="ltr">/Magnus
