Re: Search points to ancient manuals - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Search points to ancient manuals
Date
Msg-id CABUevEyTXVBJQsqKCNWFz1CA_2QQoU0CsWeVX5wMzQbqc_RuyA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Search points to ancient manuals  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Search points to ancient manuals
List pgsql-www
<p dir="ltr"><br /> On Oct 31, 2012 6:51 PM, "Josh Berkus" <<a
href="mailto:josh@agliodbs.com">josh@agliodbs.com</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> > On 10/30/12 3:53 PM, Kevin
Grittnerwrote:<br /> > > Josh Berkus wrote:<br /> > ><br /> > >> 1. go to <a
href="http://postgresql.org">postgresql.org</a>home page.<br /> > >><br /> > >> 2. type "compile
postgres"in the search box.<br /> > >><br /> > >> 3. the first result will be the installation
chapterfrom the 6.5<br /> > >> version of the manual.<br /> > ><br /> > > Of course, if you search
for"compile postgresql" the top two entries<br /> > > are for 9.2. Perhaps we should make those equivalent in
searches?<br/> ><br /> > Well, we could really use some way to make docs other than the current<br /> >
versionhave a much lower score, automatically.  I don't know how to<br /> > implement this, though.<br /><p
dir="ltr">Wealready do this for Google, so it shouldn't be rocket science.<p dir="ltr">At one point we just didn't
indexthe unsupported versions at all, but we turned that back on when we realized the cure was worse than the disease.
However,it seems we never got around to downing the priority of the old docs. <p dir="ltr">It's just so a sql query of
course,so patches welcome ;) <p dir="ltr">/Magnus <br /> 

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Search points to ancient manuals
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Search points to ancient manuals