Re: pg_dump -j against standbys - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: pg_dump -j against standbys
Date
Msg-id CABUevExiC6gpxv+a_hQzhdMqfFug6h38SvjQhh_w1phhOLuihw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump -j against standbys  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> Here's an updated patch based on this,and the other feedback.

Looks sane in a quick once-over, but I haven't tested it.


I've run some tests and it looks good. Will apply. Thanks for the quick look!
 


--

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: pg_restore parallel-execution-deadlock issue