On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On sön, 2012-06-10 at 13:43 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> > On tis, 2012-05-29 at 22:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> >> Yeah, good arguments all around, i agree too :-) Next question is -
>> >> suggestions for naming of said paramter?
>> >
>> > --xlog-method=something? And/or -Xsomething, which would automatically
>> > enable -x?
>>
>> How's this?
>
> I wouldn't make -x and -X exclusive. The way I understood this is, -x
> means include xlog, and -X says how to.
>
> I guess either way of looking at it has its merits.
I guess it's basically two ways of doing the same thing. I'm not
especially attached to either one of them, so if you think the ohter
one is better, I won't object to changing it.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
