On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> Now, having said that, I'd like to see some more people testing it
>> than the few people I've forced to do it so far. The way to test it is
>> to go to http://www.postgresql.org/list/ and pick your list. You can
>> also go to http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/<message-id> to view a
>> message in a thread - that should also work fine if you just replace
>> "archives" with "www" in the URL of an existing message in the
>> archives *if* you were using the message-id based url.
>
> Actually, hold the presses. See this message:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20110907091634.GL24583@sonic.net
> It says "the patch is attached", but there is no attachment.
> The old archives do contain the patch.
Bug found and fixed. The problem was that we missed attachments that
were text/plain, did not have a name, but did have a filename. I first
thought it was another case of the From line in mbox, but if you
looked at the raw output you could see that we actually had the whole
thing in there. So in passing, I also wrote a small tool that lets us
reparse messages that are already in the db, whenever we change/fix
the parsing rules.
--Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
