Re: file_fdw vs relative paths - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: file_fdw vs relative paths
Date
Msg-id CABUevEwgDiqGLD-oC_LRfpRJZRq8mtWPi8FkLtmsSujB=K+2Rg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: file_fdw vs relative paths  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: file_fdw vs relative paths  (Ian Barwick <ian.barwick@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 5:03 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 01:16:05PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>     Bruce, I've applied and backpatched your docs patch for this.
>
> Gah, and of course right after doing that, I remembered I wanted to get a
> second change in :) To solve the "who's this Josh" question, I suggest we also
> change the example to point to the data/log directory which is likely to exist
> in a lot more of the cases. I keep getting people who ask "who is josh" based
> on the /home/josh path. Not that it's that important, but... 

Thanks, and agreed.


Thanks, applied. I backpacked to 13 but didn't bother with the rest as it's not technically *wrong* before..

//Magnus
 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Append with naive multiplexing of FDWs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - Provide robust alternatives for replace_string