On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:51, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> We can use
>>> pg_xlogfile_name function to calculate that, but it cannot be executed in
>>> the standby. Another problem is that pg_xlogfile_name always uses
>>> current timeline for the calculation, so if the reported timeline is not
>>> the same as current one, pg_xlogfile_name cannot return the correct WAL
>>> file name. Making pg_controldata report that WAL file name gets rid of
>>> such a complexity.
>>>
>>
>> i would think that pg_xlogfile_name() is not allowed in the standby
>> because ThisTimelineId is not very well defined in recovery but if you
>> extend pg_xlogfile_name() to also receive a timelineid as you
>> suggested in [1] then that version of the function could be allowed in
>> the standby.
>> or there is something else i'm missing?
>>
>> is that enough for you to solve your problem?
>
> Yes, we can more easily calculate the cutoff point by using that extended
> pg_xlogfile_name(). But if pg_controldata reports the WAL file name, we
> can calculate the cutoff point without starting the server. So I think that
> it's worth changing pg_controldata that way even if we extend
> pg_xlogfile_name().
+1 - I think they're both useful things, each on it's own.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
