On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 11:03 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 7:50 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 08:03:24PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > I see you've marked the patch as needs review - but as the patch > previously was marked as ready-for-committer, and I assume nothing > substantial has changed, I think RFC might still be the accurate state?
Yes, RFC sounds good to me. I think that I could look at this patch and get it into shape for PG12 as that's an area I am rather familiar with. After that it depends on Magnus as he is registered as the committer of the patch. I'll be fine to jump into the ship if need be.
Sorry, for some reason this entire thread ended up getting tracked in my spam folder :/ Yay the new gmail antispam breakage.
I was definitely still planning to work on it!
The first thing I noticed is that it needed yet another rebase because of the changes in the SSL tests. PFA an updated patch (very trivial rebase).
(I'll keep working on it, just wanted to throw the rebased patch out there)
Patched pushed, with some very minor formatting changes and a pgindent run.
Apologies for the long processing time, and thanks again for the patch!
