Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id CABUevEw=dGJ9B3+YSiz+D7tUNL560B2OuAxfAb4d7Bfzsst-KQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 01:07, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> I'm in favor of this.  People are sufficiently confused by the existing
>> behavior that we're not going to confuse them further by changing it.
>>
>
> Fwiw as someone who *was* confused previously, it now makes perfect
> sense to me. "We have postgres.conf which always applies and then
> recovery.conf which can have all the same options but they only apply
> during recover". That's much clearer than "we have two configuration

But it only means that for *some* options. Which certainly doesn't
reduce confusion.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: new createuser option for replication role
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: new createuser option for replication role