On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 23:24, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Currently, some of the per-column entries in monitoring.sgml mention the
> underlying stats function; but the coverage is incomplete, and it seems
> very cluttering anyway. I propose that we remove all that and instead
> just suggest that people examine the definition of the view if they want
> to know the names of the underlying functions.
I could've sworn I suggested this before and got shut down. However
,since I can't find a reference to that in my sent email, I'm just
going to +1 this suggestion instead :-)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
