<p dir="ltr"><p dir="ltr">On Oct 5, 2016 5:42 AM, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <<a
href="mailto:tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com">tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> > From:
<ahref="mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org">pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org</a><br /> > > [mailto:<a
href="mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org">pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org</a>]On Behalf Of Jaime Casanova<br
/>> > Well, no. We normally don't give special treatment to any minor release<br /> > > not even if it is
goingto die.<br /> > > What normally happens is that all minor releases are released the same day.<br /> >
><br/> > > Taken your example, that same day were released: 9.0.23, 9.1.19, 9.2.14,<br /> > > 9.3.10 and
9.4.5<br/> > ><br /> ><br /> > Thanks for clarification. Then, I understood that the expression "stop
releasesin September" in the release note and a pgsql-announce mail was not correct.<br /><p dir="ltr">It basically
meansstop guaranteeing that we do. As of a couple of days ago, bug fixes won't necessarily be back ported to 9.1 if
theyare difficult. But there will be one wrap-up release in November with any patches that have already been applied
buthave not yet been in a release. And after November, we will stop doing that as well. <p dir="ltr">/Magnus <br />
