Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter van Hardenberg
Subject Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017
Date
Msg-id CABTbUpifeUJrYmR3mYKCFiZ-E3V18RLh_YtHC_cbLfiqdWVLjA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017
List pgsql-hackers
A new data type, and/or a new index type could both be nicely scoped bits of work.

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:


2017-01-12 21:21 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>:
On 1/10/17 1:53 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
1. What project ideas we have?

Perhaps allowing SQL-only extensions without requiring filesystem files would be a good project.

Implementation safe evaluation untrusted PL functions - evaluation under different user under different process.

Regards

Pavel

 
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers




--
Peter van Hardenberg
San Francisco, California
"Everything was beautiful, and nothing hurt."—Kurt Vonnegut

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] gettimeofday is at the end of its usefulness?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix a bug in how we generate partition constraints.